Forum rules
This section is for people who shoot or want to shoot in competitions and includes future events, how to get started, choice of rifle and calibres including wildcats, how to prepare for your competition, and of course how you did!
targetman wrote:
Better shooters, better rifles, or better ammunition ?
All three
Incidently the guy in 100th place had 149 going into the final, had a 70 with a miss at 900 yards then his rifle broke at 1000 yards (something to do with sight rail) - maybe if he had checked his rifle first . . . Never mind better luck next year
targetman wrote:I then compared this with the scores in 1970.....winning score 281. (No4 Envoy and RG)
Better shooters, better rifles, or better ammunition ?
Interesting thought. I don't think that humans have got inherently 'better' (or more determined, harder training etc. etc.). Here’s a graph of the winning scores. If I knew the relevant dates I could overlay things like target dimension changes, changes of ammo (RUAG from 2009?), the switch from SR(A/B) etc.
rox wrote:
If I knew the relevant dates I could overlay things like target dimension changes, changes of ammo (RUAG from 2009?), the switch from SR(A/B) etc.
Now that would be an interesting diagram!
Come on Bambi get some
Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad
HeatherW762 wrote:Reply from John about his rifle reads:
'Heather
I used a Swing action with a Bartlein barrel (30” 1 in 13 twist 5R).
Can’t imagine who would be interested, however there you are!
Regards
John'
Heather
Send him a link and get him involved!
I could use any advice he has to offer to help achieve winning the Queens
Absolutely - any tips from the best are very welcome. The last time I had a go at the Queens (long time ago), I got counted out on a 102, so just getting to the next round would make me happy...and to get to the final would cross one off my 'bucket list'...