Page 3 of 5
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:51 pm
by Polchraine
Robin128 wrote:Polchraine wrote:
But the FAC form states that if you are applying for a coterminus set then only four are required.
It doesn't Polchraine.
the exact words:
In the case of an application for both a firearm and a shot gun certificate each of the referees should endorse a separate photograph and two photographs must be signed by you.
Page 4 and just below half way on the left hand side. What else does that mean?
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:55 pm
by Robin128
Read the para before it.
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:09 pm
by Polchraine
That states 4 - and there is the rider which I refer to which applies if someone is applying for both ...
I'll scan and upload part of the letter I sent with mine which states 4 pictures ...
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:28 pm
by Robin128
What does that prove Polchraine??
The Form 101 is quite clear...each of the two referees should endorse seperate photographs, together with two photographs signed by you...that's a minimum of SIX in anybody's book.
Dear me.
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:30 pm
by Polchraine
Robin128 wrote:What does that prove Polchraine??
The Form 101 is quite clear...each of the two referees should endorse seperate photographs, together with two photographs signed by you...that's SIX in anybody's book.
Dear me.
Two referees - the each endorse ONE so 1 + 1 = 2
You sign two ...
Photograph 1 - endorsed by John Smith
Photograph 2 - Endorsed by Mike Jones
Photograph 3 - signed by You
Photograph 4 - signed by You
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:36 pm
by Robin128
If each referee has to sign seperate photographs and there are 2 referees, that means 4 in all, plus 2 = 6.
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:50 pm
by Polchraine
No, each one signs just one ... where does it say each to sign two?
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:20 pm
by Robin128
Polchraine wrote:No, each one signs just one ... where does it say each to sign two?
...
each of the two referees should endorse
seperate photograph
s
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:36 pm
by Polchraine
Robin128 wrote:Polchraine wrote:No, each one signs just one ... where does it say each to sign two?
...
each of the two referees should endorse
seperate photograph
s
Yes you have two photograph
s and each signs one. It would not make grammatical sense if the phrase was:
Each of the two referees should endorse separate photograph.
You have seen the letter, maybe it does not "prove" the fact, but as mine went straight through in 10 days with just 4 photographs indicates that 4 is the required number.
What do they actually do with the pictures? They do not stick them on the certificates.
Re: Cable lock for wall attachment
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 3:39 pm
by ovenpaa
It could always be down to the individual FEO's interpretation, has anyone tried calling one?
