Weapons of War
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Should your post be in Grumpy Old Men? This area is for general shooting related posts only please.
Weapons of War
Calling them “weapons of war” that are “not protected by the Second Amendment,” a federal appeals court Tuesday upheld Maryland’s ban on semi-automatic guns with “certain military style features” passed by the state after the 2012 Newtown school massacre.
The 10-4 ruling casts aside a lower court decision that questioned the constitutionality of a law that is similar to ones in states like California, Connecticut and New Jersey.
But the wording goes much farther than the laws in those states, declaring that “assault weapons and large-capacity magazines are not protected by the Second Amendment, The Washington Post is reporting. The majority opinion, written by Judge Robert B. King, refers to the banned firearms as “weapons of war” that the court says are most useful in the military.
http://thefederalistpapers.org/second-a ... nt-gun-ban
The 10-4 ruling casts aside a lower court decision that questioned the constitutionality of a law that is similar to ones in states like California, Connecticut and New Jersey.
But the wording goes much farther than the laws in those states, declaring that “assault weapons and large-capacity magazines are not protected by the Second Amendment, The Washington Post is reporting. The majority opinion, written by Judge Robert B. King, refers to the banned firearms as “weapons of war” that the court says are most useful in the military.
http://thefederalistpapers.org/second-a ... nt-gun-ban
Re: Weapons of War
When I renewed my French FAC, my semi-auto AR15 found itself described as "fusil de guerre" (War Rifle" in 5,56x45. I objected and had it re-classified as simply "semi-auto rifle in 223R".
I feel & fear, it is a sneaky slippery sloop ... Dammed Libtards !!
I feel & fear, it is a sneaky slippery sloop ... Dammed Libtards !!

- Les
- Posts: 4561
- Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 12:19 pm
- Home club or Range: WRPC
- Location: Runcorn, via Africa and parts unknown.
- Contact:
Re: Weapons of War
Sooo, if the victims or police were to be advised or allowed to use 40mm grenade launchers, that would solve the reloading problem ...... wouldn't it?The court also found that Maryland lawmakers were justified in passing the ban in the interest of public safety because magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition “enable shooters to inflict mass casualties while depriving victims and law enforcement officers of opportunities to escape or overwhelm the shooters while they reload their weapons.”


Re: Weapons of War
They could always drag out a few of those drum mag equipped 1921 Thompsons that must still be stashed away in Police/FBI armouries..... razzLes wrote:Sooo, if the victims or police were to be advised or allowed to use 40mm grenade launchers, that would solve the reloading problem ...... wouldn't it?The court also found that Maryland lawmakers were justified in passing the ban in the interest of public safety because magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition “enable shooters to inflict mass casualties while depriving victims and law enforcement officers of opportunities to escape or overwhelm the shooters while they reload their weapons.”![]()
-
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 9:07 am
- Home club or Range: Isle Target Sports Club
- Location: Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
Re: Weapons of War
So.... are they expecting people who are intent on doing others harm, to respect the 10 or less magazine law..? Bearing in mind that the country is overflowing with 30 rd mags...??Les wrote:Sooo, if the victims or police were to be advised or allowed to use 40mm grenade launchers, that would solve the reloading problem ...... wouldn't it?The court also found that Maryland lawmakers were justified in passing the ban in the interest of public safety because magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition “enable shooters to inflict mass casualties while depriving victims and law enforcement officers of opportunities to escape or overwhelm the shooters while they reload their weapons.”![]()
Re: Weapons of War
The Virginia Tech shooter, who killed 50+ used magazines restricted to 10 rounds in a Glock 19.

Re: Weapons of War
Total and utter drivel, you will see this being challenged.The court also found that Maryland lawmakers were justified in passing the ban in the interest of public safety because magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition “enable shooters to inflict mass casualties while depriving victims and law enforcement officers of opportunities to escape or overwhelm the shooters while they reload their weapons.”
In all those incidents (and the recent one in Istanbul) the casualty rates were MUCH less than could be expected because the nutter couldn't shoot and also the fact that people are NOT getting away but "hiding" in huddled groups which makes a target rich envronment.
New facts are showing these murderrs shoot themselves when the police arrive or warning shots are fired (warning shots


AR15's are NOT weapons or war, they are modern sporting rifles, albeit with a design over 50 years old. In any case, AR's are NOT the normal "mass shooting" tool of choice. Nowadays many police patrol cars cary a patrol rifle (usually an AR but there are other types)
Also the 2nd Ammendment doesn't mention any of the stuff they rabbit on about now, again grounds for appeal. Thankfully trump is against this nonsensical stuff from the courts. The 2nd Amendment is a right.
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-mass-murde ... e-shooting
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nati ... s/1920601/
Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
- bradaz11
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 4791
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:23 am
- Home club or Range: The tunnel at Charmouth, BWSS
- Location: Bristol
- Contact:
Re: Weapons of War
So would that mean all police officers would have to hand thiers in too, as last time I checked, they aren't soldiers either and so have no need for 'weapons of war' either, as afterall, they are there to protect and serve aren't they?
When guns are outlawed, only Outlaws will have guns
Re: Weapons of War
In some silly states that magazine ban DID impact on the law enforcement I believe..
If you carry a .45 1911 nothing has really changed though.
If you carry a .45 1911 nothing has really changed though.

Political Correctness is the language of lies, written by the corrupt , spoken by the inept!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests